Monthly


Polish Courts' Case Law

Slider
Mlotek Sedziowski 00060

Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich [Polish Courts’ Case Law] is the oldest continuously issued Polish scholarly journal where research focuses on the decisions of Polish courts, in both the first and second instances, as well as courts examining extraordinary appeals or constitutional complaints. The periodical presents individual court judgments and remarks in the form of commentaries on these judgments.
Thanks to its synthetic and problem-oriented character, a commentary on a judgment – being the basic and one of the oldest forms of academic reflection in jurisprudence – enables the commentator to refer to recent issues examined by Polish courts and to expand the readers’ knowledge by presenting the current background, while putting the judgments in the context of existing literature and case law.



ISSN 0867-1850 



The journal’s mission is to disseminate knowledge about selected case law of Polish courts concerning topical issues and to present systematic and comprehensive legal academic reflection on these issues.
When discussing the judgments, the authors stress the importance, the topical character, and the socioeconomic consequences of individual judicial decisions; they also attempt to spot trends in the development of Polish case law.
The requirements set for the commentaries published in Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich are just as high as those for academic articles. The review process employed by the Editorial Board ensures meeting these requirements. Commentaries accepted for print are original academic papers, containing multi-aspect analyses of the legal questions that the commented judgments concern.
The systematic character means that case law has been analysed in a continuous manner, without interruptions, since 1957. Moreover, the current Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich continues the legacy of a pre-WWII periodical also titled Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich. The journal is published monthly, always with the same sections and a similar number of judgments and commentaries.
The comprehensive character of the analyses is manifested in the fact that scholarly reflection covers judgments of general and administrative courts, as well as the Supreme Court of Poland. Each issue contains commentaries from the four main groups of legal questions decided by Polish courts: private law, criminal law, labour and social security law, and public law.
Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich remains of current relevance, because it accepts papers discussing judgments issued recently, where topical problems important for Polish case law are decided.

Ethical principles

Ethical principles concerning publications in academic journals

Ethical principles concerning publications in academic journals

Wolters Kluwer Polska publishing house, part of Wolters Kluwer international publishing house, which is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), https://publicationethics.org, applies the organization’s standards and recommendations in the publishing process.

 

Ethical principles for authors

We only accept original, previously unpublished manuscripts for publication. Submitting the same manuscripts to more than one journal is considered inappropriate. The author represents that he/she has not expressed and will not express consent for another journal to publish the manuscript. If the aforementioned representation is found not to be true, the editorial board has the right to refuse to publish the manuscript.
Authors can submit for publication only their own original manuscripts. Plagiarism or data fabrication constitute academic misconduct.
Please provide (in notes) information about the sources of funding for a given publication, such as domestic or international grants, subsidies from foundations, associations or commercial institutions. 
In case of co-authorship, please state the percentages which individual authors contributed to the publication.
The author is responsible for the manuscript reflecting the current state of law, quoted provisions of law, case law and literature. If, after manuscript submission, the author finds an error or inaccuracy in it, the author has a duty to promptly notify the editorial board about it.
The author should make references to the publications which had an influence on the submitted manuscript in the form of quotes and in the attached bibliography.
The author warrants that the copyright in the manuscript, which copyright is transferred to the publisher upon the editorial board accepting the manuscript, will not be limited by any third party rights, that the use and disposal of the manuscript by the publisher will not infringe personal interests or rights of third parties.
The manuscripts submitted by the authors are published on the basis of publishing agreements with authors, where all copyright law issues are regulated.
Ghostwriting. In order to counteract cases of ghostwriting or guest authorship, authors have a duty to disclose to the editorial board and notify it about the contributions of individual authors in the creation of the publication (stating their affiliations and contributions, i.e. who is the author of conceptions, assumptions, methods, etc. used in preparing the publication). The main responsibility for that is borne by the author who submits the manuscript. Authors are obligated to provide the editorial board with information about the contributions of scientific research institutions, associations, and other entities. The editorial board informs that ghostwriting and guest authorship are regarded as scientific misconduct. Any detected cases will be exposed, including notifying the relevant entities (institutions employing such authors, academic societies, associations of academic editors, etc.).

Responsibilities of the editorial board

The editorial board documents any cases of academic misconduct, especially violations and infringements of the ethical principles applicable in the academia.
Any decision to publish an article is based on reviews, the opinion of the subject editor and the editorial college. The decision whether or not to publish is also influenced by the risk of copyright violations. 
In the process of making the decision to accept or reject a given academic manuscript, the important factors include originality, academic quality, and compatibility with the journal’s range of topics.
No member of the editorial board can disclose any information about any submitted manuscript to any other person than - in accordance with the editorial procedure - its author, reviewers, potential reviewers or the publisher. 
The editorial board does not disclose reviewers’ data to authors.
Information obtained in the process of publication evaluation, as well as the rejected manuscripts or their fragments, cannot be used in own research of the editorial board members or reviewers without the author’s express written consent.
The editorial board does not appoint as reviewers any persons who report directly to the manuscript authors or who are in any other direct personal or professional relations with them to the extent that might result in conflicts of interests.

Responsibilities of reviewers

Manuscripts are reviewed before publication. For the academic evaluation of each manuscript, the editorial board appoints at least two reviewers from among the members of the academic council, editorial college or other specialists in the field that the manuscript concerns. 
The names of the reviewers of particular manuscripts are not disclosed to authors. The list of reviewers who cooperate with the journal, without naming the reviewer of a specific manuscript, is published on the journal’s website and in its printed version.
A reviewer supports the editor-in-chief in making editorial decisions and may also support the author in improving the manuscript.
Each selected reviewer who is unable to review a manuscript or knows that it is impossible to quickly prepare a review should inform the managing editor about it.
Reviews should be objective. Personal critique of the author is considered improper. Reviewers should express their views clearly, supporting them with appropriate arguments.
All reviewed manuscripts must be treated as confidential documents. They cannot be shown to or discussed about with any other persons than the managing editor, who is authorized.
Confidential information or ideas inspired by the review must be kept secret and cannot be used in order to gain personal benefits. Reviewers should not review manuscripts where there is a conflict of interests resulting from the relationship with the author, company or institution connected with the manuscript.
Reviewers should identify the publications that the manuscript author failed to refer to. A reviewer should also inform the managing editor about any significant similarity, partial overlap of the contents of the manuscript under review with any other published work known to the reviewer or a suspected plagiarism.

Editorial Team

Editorial Committee

Members of the Editorial Committee of Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich monthly include:

prof. dr hab. Marek Safjan (przewodniczący)
Sędzia Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej, urlopowany profesor Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
prof. dr hab. Andrzej Bierć
Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
prof. dr hab. Tadeusz Ereciński
Uniwersytet Warszawski
prof. dr hab. Lech Gardocki
Uniwersytet Warszawski
prof. dr hab. Jan Jończyk
Uniwersytet Wrocławski
prof. dr hab. Ewa Łętowska
Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN
prof. dr hab. Walerian Sanetra
Uniwersytet Białostocki
prof. dr hab. Jan Skupiński
Uniwersytet Gdański
prof. dr hab. Janusz Trzciński
Uniwersytet Wrocławski
prof. dr hab. Stanisław Waltoś
Uniwersytet Jagielloński

Reviewers

The (peer) reviewers of Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich monthly for 2018 included the following persons:

Zdzisław Brodecki
Teresa Dukiet-Nagórska
Bogusława Gnela
Edward Gniewek
Jacek Górecki
Kazimierz Jaśkowski
Andrzej Kabat
Przemysław Kalinowski
Andrzej Matan
Teresa Mróz
Leszek Ogiegło
Aleksander Oleszko
Piotr Stec
Andrzej Torbus
Tadeusz Wiśniewski
Feliks Zedler

Contact Us

For more information on the journal contact the Editorial Board

For more information on the journal contact the Editorial Board

envelope

Wolters Kluwer Polska Sp. z o.o.
ul. Przyokopowa 33
01-208 Warszawa

e-mail: Ten adres pocztowy jest chroniony przed spamowaniem. Aby go zobaczyć, konieczne jest włączenie w przeglądarce obsługi JavaScript.